Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that To wholeheartedly endorse the long-term shape of one's life, one must see that shape as consistent with one's happiness.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle's own account allows that the magnanimous person may sacrifice happiness for noble ends, affirming this as the highest expression of virtue.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Wholehearted endorsement tracks rational coherence with one's deepest commitments, not consistency with one's happiness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Bernard Williams argues that ground projects can constitute personal identity even when they systematically undermine the agent's subjective well-being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If endorsement of one's life is grounded in integrity to ground projects, happiness becomes a contingent rather than necessary condition of affirmation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Wholehearted endorsement of one's life requires affirming its overall trajectory.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A life structured around sacrificing happiness cannot be wholeheartedly affirmed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42