Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Tolerance of an evil is distinct from approval or endorse... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Some necessary evils may be tolerated without being morally approved or endorsed by gospel teaching

    Tolerance of an evil is distinct from approval or endorsement of that evil

    Forgiveness & MercyMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityForgiveness & Mercy

    Connections

    3 topics

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Problem of Evil
    1 linked
    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Some necessary evils may be tolerated without being morally approved or endorsed...Tolerating a lesser evil can prevent a greater evil

    Similar

    If approval and disapproval were based on personal advantage, we would...77%If evil does not follow from the essential natures of created things, ...75%Some necessary evils may be tolerated without being morally approved o...75%There is a fundamental asymmetry between moral good and moral evil75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: erasmus
    View source passageHide passage
    We should not propagate the Christian religion only with arms, nor should princes undertake war when it can be avoided by using other means. They should, moreover, conduct a war they have undertaken with a minimum of bloodshed and end it as quickly as possible. Finally, [war] is not compatible with the purity of the gospel, and we must not seek to derive the right to go to war from gospel precepts…There are many necessary evils in human affairs, which are tolerated because they prevent greater e

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective