Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Transcendental arguments have a distinctively Kantian character because Kant made accounting for metaphysical knowledge of transcendental claims the focus of his critical project.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Transcendental claims concern metaphysical knowledge of how things must be.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's critical project was specifically designed to account for how such metaphysical knowledge is possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Transcendental idealism is Kant's proposed answer to how knowledge of this sort is possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.