Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Transcendentals like 'being', 'one', and 'good' function ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A transcendental is not necessarily common to many inferiors.

    Transcendentals like 'being', 'one', and 'good' function as the most universal predicates, applicable across all categories without restriction.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Every entity, regardless of category, must possess being; non-being cannot be predicated of anything that exists or can be discussed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Substances, accidents, and abstract objects all exhibit degrees of unity and composition, making 'one' a genuinely universal measure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.All beings exhibit some form of perfection or desirability relative to their nature, grounding 'good' as a transcendental predicate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mathematical objects and abstract propositions do not possess 'being' in the same sense as physical substances, undermining universality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.'Good' is fundamentally evaluative and context-dependent; its application requires external standards, unlike genuine category-neutral predicates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.These terms function as obscuring metaphors rather than substantive predicates; they explain nothing by applying to everything equally.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    'Good' is fundamentally evaluative and context-dependent; its application requir...A transcendental is not necessarily common to many inferiors.All beings exhibit some form of perfection or desirability relative to their nat...Every entity, regardless of category, must possess being; non-being cannot be pr...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mathematical objects and abstract propositions do not possess 'being' in the sam...Substances, accidents, and abstract objects all exhibit degrees of unity and com...These terms function as obscuring metaphors rather than substantive predicates; ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit