Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Transferring properties from abstract arguments to token ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Logical concepts such as logical consequence and logical probability can be applied indirectly to mental inferences

    Transferring properties from abstract arguments to token mental events conflates the normative and descriptive dimensions of reasoning, as Frege warned against psychologism.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Abstract logical laws (like non-contradiction) are normative standards independent of any particular mind's operations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Describing mental events using logical properties risks treating what ought to be true as merely what happens to occur psychologically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Frege's anti-psychologism correctly distinguished objective logical validity from subjective mental processes to protect mathematics' objectivity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Token mental events instantiate abstract properties; describing this instantiation doesn't conflate normativity with description.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We can study how brains *implement* normative standards without reducing those standards to mere neural activity—levels of analysis differ.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Cognitive science successfully uses abstract properties (information, representation) to describe mental events without collapsing normativity into description.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Abstract logical laws (like non-contradiction) are normative standards independe...Cognitive science successfully uses abstract properties (information, representa...Describing mental events using logical properties risks treating what ought to b...Frege's anti-psychologism correctly distinguished objective logical validity fro...
    +3 moreShow less
    Logical concepts such as logical consequence and logical probability can be appl...Token mental events instantiate abstract properties; describing this instantiati...We can study how brains *implement* normative standards without reducing those s...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit