Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Treating procreation as presumptively morally problematic... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Part of a larger discussion

Challenges→Procreation is routinely more morally problematic than is generally recognized.

Treating procreation as presumptively morally problematic inverts the proper burden of proof, which falls on those who would restrict fundamental liberties, not on those who exercise them.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

?

1.Reproductive autonomy is a fundamental liberty historically protected across legal systems and moral frameworks as basic to human dignity.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Burden of proof traditionally rests on those proposing restrictions, not those exercising recognized freedoms without direct harm to others.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Assuming procreation is problematic reverses this principle, requiring the fertile to justify their reproductive choices affirmatively.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

1 perspective

Reason against

?

1.Procreation directly creates new beings affected by profound interests (existence, suffering), warranting ethical scrutiny beyond standard liberty claims.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Standard burden-of-proof frameworks assume exercises of liberty affect only consenting parties; procreation creates non-consenting third parties.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.Some fundamental liberties do carry presumptive restrictions (e.g., genetic engineering, human experimentation) when third-party creation/harms occur.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

Key Terms

Fundamental liberties(describing what restrictions the statement argues against): Basic freedoms that people have a strong moral or legal right to exercise, like freedom of choice over major life decisions.
Presumptively(how the moral principle applies): Based on what appears to be true unless proven otherwise; assumed to be the case by default.
Procreation(the specific liberty being debated in this statement): The act of reproducing or having children; creating new human life.
burden of proof(Used to frame the default presumption against coercive institutional structures.): The obligation on institutions employing authority, hierarchy, or domination to demonstrate that such arrangements are justified given existing conditions.

Connections

2 topics

Justice & Punishment1 linked Bioethics1 linked

Related

Assuming procreation is problematic reverses this principle, requiring the ferti...Burden of proof traditionally rests on those proposing restrictions, not those e...Procreation directly creates new beings affected by profound interests (existenc...Procreation is routinely more morally problematic than is generally recognized.

+3 moreShow less

Reproductive autonomy is a fundamental liberty historically protected across leg...Some fundamental liberties do carry presumptive restrictions (e.g., genetic engi...

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 2 (1 for, 1 against)
Edits: 1 edit

Standard burden-of-proof frameworks assume exercises of liberty affect only cons...