Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Treating the thing-in-itself as a distinct object is misc... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Awareness of the thing-in-itself must be reached through a means other than the relationship of causality.

    Treating the thing-in-itself as a distinct object is misconstrued.

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility2 linkedPerception

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    Awareness of the thing-in-itself must be reached through a means other than the ...The relationship of causality requires cause and effect to be logically distinct...The thing-in-itself cannot coherently be positioned as an effect in a causal rel...

    Similar

    Kant's reference to the thing-in-itself as a mind-independent object i...87%The thing-in-itself cannot coherently be positioned as an effect in a ...85%Invoking causality to refer to the thing-in-itself treats it as a dist...80%Considering objects as things in themselves by means of the categories...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: schopenhauer
    View source passageHide passage
    These internal problems with Kant’s argument suggest to Schopenhauer that Kant’s reference to the thing-in-itself as a mind-independent object (or as an object of any kind) is misconstrued. Schopenhauer maintains instead that if we are to refer to the thing-in-itself, then we must come to an awareness of it, not by invoking the relationship of causality – a relationship where the cause and the effect are logically understood to be distinct objects or events (since self-causation is a contradicti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective