Trope bundle theorists and nominalists who dissolve Bradley's regress by eliminating relations still face compresence or co-instantiation relations that regenerate the same regress.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Bradley's regress(General problem in ontology; Lowe's formal-relation strategy is intended to block it): An infinite regress that arises when a relation between constituents of a state of affairs is itself treated as a further constituent requiring yet another relation to bind it, and so on without end
Co-instantiation(as used in metaphysics): Multiple different things existing or occurring together at the same time in the same entity.
Regenerate(as used in biology and developmental processes): The ability of a living thing to regrow or repair damaged or lost body parts, like how a starfish can regrow an arm.
Relations: A relation is a way of describing how two or more things are connected or related to each other. For example, "is the parent of," "is taller than," or "is friends with" are all relations that show how people or objects link together. In everyday terms, it's simply a pattern or connection that shows how one thing depends on, compares to, or associates with another.

Based on where you are in your exploration