Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Truth is atemporal: propositions do not acquire truth values over time but are timelessly true or false (Frege, Russell).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Future contingents like 'There will be a sea battle tomorrow' lack determinable truth values now, suggesting time affects truth.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Temporal indexicals ('now,' 'yesterday') require evaluation at specific times, implying truth is time-dependent, not atemporal.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Our epistemic access to truth changes over time—we discover truths—suggesting truth itself may be temporally constituted, not eternal.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Mathematical truths (2+2=4) seem invariant across time, suggesting truth is independent of temporal location.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If 'It rains on Jan 1, 2024' was true then false, propositions would change truth value—but this contradicts logical identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Tenseless logic avoids paradoxes: 'It will rain' is timelessly true or false relative to specific temporal coordinates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.