Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Truth is communicated through signs that require interpretation, not through direct disclosure.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Parmenides' goddess delivers truth through direct propositional disclosure, not signs requiring interpretation (DK B2-B8).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The 'Way of Truth' in the Proem presents being's nature as directly statable: 'it is and cannot not be'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If truth required interpretive signs essentially, Parmenides' deductive chain would be undermined by the very medium expressing it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle argues in Metaphysics IV that truth is the mind's direct correspondence to how things are, not mediated semiotic inference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If all truth-communication required interpretive signs, an infinite regress follows: each sign's interpretation would itself require another sign.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The lord whose oracle is at Delphi neither speaks nor conceals, but gives a sign (DKB93/LM41).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Heraclitus' own obscure remarks point to the truth in the same way natural evidence does.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.