Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Two names can present the same Bedeutung in different ways — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Sinn of 'Hesperus' differs from the Sinn of 'Phosphorus'

    Two names can present the same Bedeutung in different ways

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    'Hesperus' presents Venus as the evening star while 'Phosphorus' presents Venus ...The Sinn of 'Hesperus' differs from the Sinn of 'Phosphorus'

    Similar

    Coreferential names can differ in sense88%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Two names can present the same referent via different modes of present...86%
    Some names must therefore denote more than one thing, creating ambiguo...82%
    The names 'Superman' and 'Clark Kent' differ in sense despite being co...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    Frege also made a different kind of contribution, which would prove important, to the study of propositions. In early work, he spoke as though propositional constituents were the relevant functions and (ordered n-tuples of) entities that such functions map to truth-values. But he later refined this view in light of his distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung; see the entry on Frege. The Sinn of an expression was said to be a “way of presenting” the corresponding Bedeutung, which might be an ent

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective