Two predications with different built-in temporal indices are not univocal contradictories, so the apparent logical contradiction in relative identity cases never arises in the first place.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Logical contradiction(as what the stratified framework avoids): When two statements cannot both be true at the same time because they directly oppose each other. For example, 'it is raining' and 'it is not raining' are contradictory.
contradictories(Preserved intuition in paraconsistent semantics): A and B are contradictories iff, if A is true, B is false, and if A is false, B is true.
predication(Soames treats predication as a primitive notion that underlies but does not reduce to belief.): A primitive mental act whereby an agent represents an object as having a property — for example, representing o as red via perception, thought, or nonlinguistic perceptual belief.
relative identity(The passage argues against the coherence of relative identity using Leibniz's Law.): The view that identity can hold relative to a sortal, so that a and b may be the same F but not the same G.
temporal indices(as used in logic and philosophy of time): Built-in time markers that specify when something is true—like saying 'John is tall at age 20' versus 'John is short at age 5,' where the times (age 20 vs. age 5) are the temporal indices.
univocal(Contrasted with homonymy in Aristotle's predication theory): A term applied in the same sense across all its predications.

1 topic