Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Two sentences expressing the same proposition must always have the same reference.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Frege's 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' shows co-referential terms can differ in sense, so propositional identity does not fix reference uniquely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If two sentences express the same proposition via different senses, the sense-to-reference mapping is many-to-one, breaking the determination claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kripke's modal argument establishes that proper names are rigid designators, referring to the same object across all possible worlds regardless of descriptive content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Two sentences embedding the same name in different propositional contexts can express distinct propositions while sharing identical referential values, inverting the claimed dependency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Two sentences with the same content express the same proposition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Content (sense) determines reference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.