Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Two sentences with identical truth sets can diverge in what they entail if their constitutive grounds differ, so D need not inherit E's entailment profile.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If D and E have identical truth sets, they share all truth-conditions in any possible world, making their grounds irrelevant to entailment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Entailment is a logical relation defined by truth-preservation, not by constitutive grounds or metaphysical structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Allowing ground-dependent entailment divergence risks making entailment too fine-grained to be a stable logical notion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Grounding is finer-grained than truth conditions: what makes something true differs from whether it is true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Entailment tracks explanatory relationships, not just truth-value preservation across possible worlds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.D and E can be true via different causal or metaphysical structures, yielding different downstream consequences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.