Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Tying retribution to a broader theory of justice risks co... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if the first justificatory strategy were supplemented by a theoretical justification for punitive hard treatment tied to a more general set of principles of justice.

    Tying retribution to a broader theory of justice risks collapsing the distinction between desert-based punishment and consequentialist social regulation, undermining retributivism's core commitments.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Retributivism's distinctive appeal is punishing wrongdoing because it's deserved, not because punishment produces social benefits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Embedding retribution in broader justice frameworks forces justification through consequentialist outcomes like deterrence or rehabilitation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Once retribution becomes instrumentally justified by social utility, it loses its principled distinction from forward-looking punishment regimes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Pure retributivism disconnected from any theory of justice appears arbitrary—why should desert matter if it serves no rational purpose?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Justice theories (fairness, rights, rule of law) can constrain retribution without reducing it to consequentialism or instrumentality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Desert and social consequences aren't inherently opposed; retribution can be both deserved *and* justified within a coherent justice framework.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Desert-based punishment(as used in ethics and punishment theory)
    Punishment given because someone deserves it based on what they did wrong, not because it will prevent future crimes or help society in other ways.
    Retribution(as used in philosophy of punishment)
    The idea that punishment should be given to someone because they deserve it—basically, payback for wrongdoing, rather than punishment aimed at other goals like protecting society.
    Retributivism(as used in ethics and justice philosophy)
    A theory of punishment that says people deserve to be punished in proportion to the harm they caused—the worse the crime, the harsher the punishment should be.
    Social regulation(as used in philosophy of punishment)
    Rules and punishments used to control how people behave in society—like laws designed to keep communities safe and functioning.
    consequentialist(Shared position of Russell and Moore)
    One who believes that the rightness or otherwise of an act is in some way dependent on consequences.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Desert and social consequences aren't inherently opposed; retribution can be bot...Embedding retribution in broader justice frameworks forces justification through...Justice theories (fairness, rights, rule of law) can constrain retribution witho...Once retribution becomes instrumentally justified by social utility, it loses it...
    +3 moreShow less
    Pure retributivism disconnected from any theory of justice appears arbitrary—why...Retributivism's distinctive appeal is punishing wrongdoing because it's deserved...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    The notion of retributive justice would be on sounder footing if the first justi...