Tymoczko and Brueckner are also committed to content comp... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Tymoczko and Brueckner are also committed to content compatibilism

Consciousness & Mind Skepticism

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

2 reasons against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

?

1.Tymoczko and Brueckner propose anti-skeptical arguments of the same form as Warfield's argument
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.Any defender of anti-skeptical arguments of that form is committed to content compatibilism
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reasons Against

2 perspectives

Reason against 1 of 2

?

1.Brueckner explicitly distinguishes his anti-skeptical strategy as targeting the skeptic's own reasoning rather than establishing positive content compatibility claims.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.An argument that merely exploits the skeptic's self-undermining use of content need not presuppose that BIV-compatible narrow content and wide content are jointly coherent.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.A commitment to content compatibilism requires affirming the coherence of both content types together, not merely using wide content attributions dialectically.
?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

Reason against 2 of 2

?

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Strongest counterpoint

Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.