Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Type recursions and the Price Equation impose different constraints on how temporally variable selection must be classified
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
The Price Equation is a mathematical identity that holds universally, so any constraint it imposes applies equally to type recursions by logical necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If both formalisms describe the same biological phenomenon, apparent classificatory differences reflect notational choice, not genuine ontological divergence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Okasha's work shows that type recursions and the Price Equation are inter-translatable representations, undermining claims of asymmetric constraint between them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A difference in classificatory constraint requires that one formalism excludes cases the other permits, but no such exclusion has been demonstrated in the formal literature on temporally variable selection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Type recursions require treating temporally variable selection as cases of selection
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The Price Equation imposes no similar constraint on how temporally variable selection is classified
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.