Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Unconditional hospitality requires welcoming all others w... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Unconditional hospitality requires welcoming all others without condition, judgment, or documentation

    Rights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.With the border open as wide as possible, all others must be treated as friends rather than enemies to be expelled or exterminated
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Unconditional hospitality means letting others in no matter what, without asking for papers and without judging them, even when uninvited
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hobbes and Locke establish that political communities require bounded membership to sustain the reciprocal obligations that make rights possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Unconditional hospitality dissolves the sovereign authority whose coercive power protects the very rights hospitality claims to honor.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A host who cannot refuse entry ceases to be a host in any meaningful sense, collapsing the host-guest distinction Derrida's own analysis presupposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Walzer's 'Spheres of Justice' argues that communities have legitimate claims to self-determination, including democratic control over membership criteria.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Unconditional admission denies existing members the collective self-governance that grounds their own political standing as rights-bearing agents.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rawlsian justice applies within cooperative schemes whose stability depends on bounded membership prior to distributive principles being operative.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Related

    A host who cannot refuse entry ceases to be a host in any meaningful sense, coll...Hobbes and Locke establish that political communities require bounded membership...Rawlsian justice applies within cooperative schemes whose stability depends on b...Unconditional admission denies existing members the collective self-governance t...
    +4 moreShow less
    Unconditional hospitality dissolves the sovereign authority whose coercive power...Unconditional hospitality means letting others in no matter what, without asking...Walzer's 'Spheres of Justice' argues that communities have legitimate claims to ...With the border open as wide as possible, all others must be treated as friends ...

    Similar

    Unconditional hospitality requires welcoming others without prior judg...95%Unconditional hospitality means letting others in no matter what, with...89%Full unconditional hospitality is always deferred to the future rather...75%Any attempt to realize unconditional hospitality therefore falls short...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: derrida
    View source passageHide passage
    As I said, Derrida always uses the basic argumentation that we have laid out against the idea of the worst; today the tendency towards the worst is greater than ever. The purpose in the application – this purpose defines deconstruction—is to move us towards, not the worst violence, not the most violence, but the least violence (Writing and Difference, p. 130). How does the application of the argumentation against the worst work? Along with globalization, the post-Cold War period sees, as Derrida
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit