Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Under more constrained accounts of intuition, it is not c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It is not clearly possible for a creature to have intuitions significantly different from our own.

    Under more constrained accounts of intuition, it is not clear that a creature could have intuitions with contents generally contradicting our own.

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Truth & Knowledge
    1 linked

    Related

    Intuitions justifying the metaphysical possibility of such a creature appear to ...It is not clearly possible for a creature to have intuitions significantly diffe...The claim that such a creature is metaphysically possible is itself a modal clai...

    Similar

    It is not clearly possible for a creature to have intuitions significa...90%On more restrictive accounts of intuition, there is no reason why the ...83%Skeptical arguments against intuitions aim to show that intuitions do ...83%Selective skepticism about intuitions requires showing something disti...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: intuition
    View source passageHide passage
    It may also be argued (Pust 2004) that it isn’t, as seems assumed by Field’s objection, clearly possible for a creature to have intuitions significantly different from our own. Given the more constrained accounts of intuition discussed above, it is not clear that a creature might have intuitions with contents generally contradicting our own. That such a creature is metaphysically possible is itself a modal claim apparently requiring justification by intuition and such intuitions seem to be lacki

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective