Understanding a sentence requires knowing what it would be like for its truth conditions to obtain, which presupposes embodied, causal engagement with the world (Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations §201).

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Causal engagement(as used in epistemology): Direct interaction with things in the world where you can see how one thing causes another to happen. For instance, you understand 'pushing' because you've actually pushed objects and seen them move.
Embodied(as a dimension of human intelligence): The idea that intelligence and understanding are deeply tied to having a physical body—your brain doesn't work in isolation, but through how your body interacts with the world.
Ludwig Wittgenstein(the philosopher whose critique is referenced): An influential 20th-century philosopher who revolutionized thinking about language by claiming that words get their meaning from everyday use, not from representing fixed ideas.
Philosophical Investigations(as the source text being referenced): Wittgenstein's most influential book, published after his death, where he explores how language works through everyday examples and imaginary scenarios rather than abstract theory.

Based on where you are in your exploration