Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Unification is the process by which such a common substit... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The key to ensuring the applicability of detachment is finding a common substitution instance of the minor premise and the antecedent of the major premise

    Unification is the process by which such a common substitution instance is found

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Detachment requires that the minor premise and the antecedent of the major premi...The key to ensuring the applicability of detachment is finding a common substitu...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Assumption (B): some further substitution principle applied to sentenc...75%Kvanvig identifies an analogous substitution error in Fitch's argument74%This substitution opens onto spontaneous communication.74%The replacement sequence pairs are fixed and the substitution is perfo...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-combinatory
    View source passageHide passage
    If substitution were dropped altogether, then the applicability of detachment would become extremely limited, for instance, \(\textsf{SK}\) no longer would be typable. A compromise between having substitution everywhere and having no substitution at all is to modify the detachment rule so that that includes as much substitution as necessary to ensure the applicability of the detachment rule. Such a rule (without combinatory terms or type assignments) was invented in the 1950s by Carew A. Meredit

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective