Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Universal truths are those that hold in every actual case — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If a moral truth is necessary, then that moral truth must be universal

    Universal truths are those that hold in every actual case

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If a moral truth is necessary, then that moral truth must be universalIf a proposition must be true, then that proposition is true in every actual cas...

    Similar

    Necessary truths are true in every possible world86%Necessary truths are propositions that are true in all possible worlds...85%There are truths in themselves82%Malebranche holds that only necessary truths can be demonstrated80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-epistemology-a-priori
    View source passageHide passage
    Thus, on a standard reading of Book II, the prescriptive content of moral claims, along with their necessity and universality, led Kant to believe we know moral truths only a priori. However, some interpret Kant as saying that if a moral truth is a priori, then it must also be necessary and universal (Dancy 2007: 45). On this interpretation, if one knows P a priori, then P must be necessary; after all, it’s unclear how one could know a contingent truth without experience. Moreover, if P is neces

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective