Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Universities defending affirmative action on educational-... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Universities defending affirmative action on educational-benefit grounds may not sincerely believe the educational-benefit rationale.

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If universities genuinely justified affirmative action solely on educational benefit grounds, they would abandon affirmative action programs if studies showed no educational benefit from racial diversity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It is implausible that the University of Michigan or the University of Texas would abandon affirmative action even if studies showed no cognitive growth from increased racial diversity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the educational-benefit rationale is not the true or complete justification for affirmative action programs at these institutions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism2 linked

    Related

    If universities genuinely justified affirmative action solely on educational ben...It is implausible that the University of Michigan or the University of Texas wou...Therefore, the educational-benefit rationale is not the true or complete justifi...

    Similar

    Therefore, the educational-benefit rationale is not the true or comple...90%If universities genuinely justified affirmative action solely on educa...86%It is implausible that the University of Michigan or the University of...80%The affirmative action goals promoted by disparate impact laws are wor...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: affirmative-action
    View source passageHide passage
    Now consider four points. First, the promiscuous use of “diversity” in the argument for affirmative action opens the door to waffling and equivocation. Students learn through “exposure to widely diverse people, culture, ideas, and viewpoints” announces the Fortune 100 brief. Of course. But the issue at hand is racial diversity. Wrapping the latter into the former is not an aid to precision.[26] Second, can we imagine that the University of Michigan or the University of Texas would abandon its af
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit