Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Upholding LPF equal opportunity is compatible with a broader theory of justice that also favors more and better opportunities for people.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Expanding opportunities requires redistributive interventions that structurally undermine the formal procedural neutrality LPF equal opportunity demands.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
LPF equal opportunity presupposes a fixed competitive structure; policies that alter the opportunity landscape change the rules mid-contest, violating LPF's core logic.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Nozick's entitlement theory demonstrates that patterned outcomes from opportunity expansion necessarily violate side-constraints that formal procedural fairness itself entails.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Rawls argued that LPF equal opportunity is lexically subordinate to the difference principle, meaning its compatibility with broader justice claims is already architecturally constrained.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If LPF equal opportunity is merely one component among competing principles, its determinate action-guidance collapses into an indeterminate pluralism that cannot adjudicate real conflicts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
One can uphold LPF equal opportunity as one component of justice without insisting it is the entirety of justice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Justice might simultaneously favor equality of opportunity and favor expanding the quantity and quality of opportunities available to people.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.