Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Utilitarianism is thoroughgoing consequentialism: rules a... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Utilitarianism cannot fully capture the demands of justice as commonly understood.

    Utilitarianism is thoroughgoing consequentialism: rules are assessed strictly by the consequences of adopting them, not by their intrinsic properties.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment4 linked

    Related

    Even if a forward-looking rationale could be constructed for rules that track de...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice is often backward-looking: what is due to a person is frequently determi...
    Utilitarianism can only adopt backward-looking reasons by transmuting them into ...
    Utilitarianism cannot fully capture the demands of justice as commonly understoo...

    Similar

    Proximate consequentialism holds that the moral rightness of an act is...84%Act-consequentialism holds that an act is permissible if and only if i...83%Agent-relative consequentialism holds that an act is morally wrong if ...83%Under consequentialism, a practice is wrong only if it has bad consequ...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: justice
    View source passageHide passage
    The third and final difficulty stems from utilitarianism’s thoroughgoing consequentialism. Rules are assessed strictly in the light of the consequences of adopting then, not in terms of their intrinsic properties. Of course, when agents follow rules, they are meant to do what the rule requires rather than to calculate consequences directly. But for a utilitarian, it is never going to be a good reason for adopting a rule that it will give people what they deserve or what they are entitled to, whe

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective