Van der Sandt's (1992) binding-as-anaphora theory treats accommodation as a last resort on a preference hierarchy, not a logical impossibility, contradicting the claim that accommodation is unavailable rather than merely dispreferred for pronouns.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Binding-as-anaphora theory(the specific theory being explained): A theory about how pronouns (like 'he' or 'she') connect back to nouns mentioned earlier in a sentence—treating pronouns like they're tied to previous references.
Dispreferred(describes the status of accommodation according to van der Sandt's theory): Something that people are less likely to choose or use, even though it's still possible—like preferring tea but still being willing to drink coffee.
Last resort on a preference hierarchy(describes how accommodation works according to the theory): Something that people will only do if they can't do other things first—it's the option you fall back on when better options aren't available.
Pronouns(as used in grammar and semantics): Words like 'he,' 'she,' 'it,' or 'they' that refer back to a noun mentioned earlier.

Based on where you are in your exploration