Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Van Fraassen's constructive empiricism holds that empiric... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Confirmation of chaotic models is problematic even under the assumption of a perfect model

    Van Fraassen's constructive empiricism holds that empirical adequacy across observable trajectories suffices for confirmation, making state-underdetermination epistemically irrelevant.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Constructive empiricism(philosophy of science)
    An anti-realist position regarding science that may involve voluntarism about theory acceptance and, in some versions, skepticism toward the principle of induction
    Epistemically irrelevant(epistemology)
    Not important or not mattering when it comes to questions about knowledge and justified belief.
    Observable trajectories(as what needs to match the theory)
    The paths or patterns of things we can directly see, measure, or detect through our senses or instruments.
    State-underdetermination(as a problem that constructive empiricism addresses)
    A situation where multiple completely different theories could all explain the same observations equally well, so observations alone can't tell us which theory is actually true.
    Van Fraassen

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (the philosopher whose theory is being discussed)
    Bas van Fraassen is a contemporary philosopher who studies how we understand questions and knowledge. He developed influential ideas about how questions work and what it means to explain things.
    confirmation(Christensen 1999: 441; general epistemological usage)
    The epistemic relationship in which current confidence in proposition E helps make rational one's current confidence in hypothesis H
    empirical adequacy(Distinguished from full accuracy in that the degree of accuracy required depends on pragmatic considerations)
    The requirement that theories account for observations; a constraint that all legitimate research programs must satisfy

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Confirmation of chaotic models is problematic even under the assumption of a per...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective