Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Van Inwagen's theory has not demonstrated the consistency of trinitarianism.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Van Inwagen's theory remains neutral on the issue of identity, which allows that the three Persons are absolutely non-identical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the three Persons are absolutely non-identical, it is hard to see what it could mean to say they are the same being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Any things which are non-identical are not the same being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.