Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Vertical causality describes a functional role a dharma plays, but functional roles can in principle be multiply realized by numerically distinct dharmas.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If dharmas are individuated by their intrinsic natures (svabhava), numerically distinct dharmas cannot share identical functional roles without contradiction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The Buddhist principle of dependent origination ties each dharma's causal efficacy to its unique relational context, resisting functional substitutability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Multiple realization assumes mind-body-type abstraction; Buddhist dharmas lack this framework, making the claim category misapplied.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Functional roles are defined by causal relations, not intrinsic properties, so distinct dharmas with identical causal profiles realize the same role.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Buddhist metaphysics allows multiple distinct dharmas to produce identical downstream effects, supporting multiple realizability of functions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If vertical causality is about functional contribution to wholes, then substrate-independence of function supports multiple realization possibilities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.