Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Virtue ethicists have multiple resources available to add... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A virtue ethical theory can be both extensionally and explanatorily adequate

    Virtue ethicists have multiple resources available to address the adequacy objection

    Virtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue Ethics

    Related

    A virtue ethical theory can be both extensionally and explanatorily adequateMaking room for normative concepts not reducible to virtue and vice increases th...

    Similar

    The adequacy objection is most compelling against versions of virtue e...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    84%
    Virtue ethical accounts are not undermined by the adequacy objection79%
    Moral naturalism has resources to meet this shared objection that mora...73%
    There exists an objection that applies to both moral naturalism and mo...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ethics-virtue
    View source passageHide passage
    As we observed in section 2, a virtue ethical account need not attempt to reduce all other normative concepts to virtues and vices. What is required is simply (i) that virtue is not reduced to some other normative concept that is taken to be more fundamental and (ii) that some other normative concepts are explained in terms of virtue and vice. This takes the sting out of the adequacy objection, which is most compelling against versions of virtue ethics that attempt to define all of the senses of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective