Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Virtue ethics derives action-guidance from character traits, but character traits are situationally variable, as Harman and Doris demonstrate empirically.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Virtue ethics doesn't claim traits are invariant; it claims virtuous agents develop stable *dispositions to respond appropriately to context*.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Empirical variability in behavior doesn't establish that character traits don't exist—it shows virtue is contextually intelligent, not rigid.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The experiments conflate single acts with character; one situational failure doesn't prove someone lacks the stable trait of practical wisdom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Harman and Doris's experiments show helping behavior drops dramatically based on minor contextual cues, not stable character traits.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If virtue ethics prescribes cultivating honesty but situations determine honesty, the guidance becomes unreliable and practically hollow.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Situational psychology demonstrates traits like compassion vary more by environment than by individual disposition across populations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42