Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Warren and Brandeis's foundational privacy framework alre... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If we care about privacy, then we should give all control of access to personal information to the individual.

    Warren and Brandeis's foundational privacy framework already acknowledged that privacy rights yield to matters of public concern.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Warren and Brandeis explicitly discussed privacy limits when information relates to public figures or matters of legitimate public interest.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Their framework recognized privacy as a property right that, like other property rights, can be limited by competing public welfare interests.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The 1890 article acknowledged newspapers' role in reporting newsworthy events, implicitly accepting some privacy restrictions for public concern.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Warren and Brandeis's primary concern was protecting private life from intrusive disclosure; public concern exceptions were secondary, not foundational.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Their framework established privacy as a fundamental right first, with exceptions carved out narrowly—the reverse of claiming it 'already acknowledged' yielding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The article's historical context shows they opposed broad press freedom; today's expanded 'public concern' doctrine exceeds what they envisioned.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    If we care about privacy, then we should give all control of access to personal ...The 1890 article acknowledged newspapers' role in reporting newsworthy events, i...The article's historical context shows they opposed broad press freedom; today's...Their framework established privacy as a fundamental right first, with exception...
    +3 moreShow less
    Their framework recognized privacy as a property right that, like other property...Warren and Brandeis explicitly discussed privacy limits when information relates...Warren and Brandeis's primary concern was protecting private life from intrusive...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit