Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that We can argue that the world itself must be a certain way to fit the conditions imposed by our sensibility and understanding, without concluding that the world is mind-dependent.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant is right that we cannot claim direct insight into constraints on the world-in-itself, only into constraints on our sensibility and understanding.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Knowing the constraints on our faculties allows us to infer what the world must be like to satisfy those constraints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Such an inference does not require treating the world as mind-dependent or as mere appearance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.