Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    We cannot determine whether whatever we experience as an ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→We can have no theoretical knowledge of the ultimate constitution of reality as it is in itself, independent of our representations.

    We cannot determine whether whatever we experience as an object is in the end some mental product of a divine mind with creative powers unlike any we can make sense of.

    Modality & PossibilitySkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Something exists independently of our representations of it.Therefore we are bound to be agnostic with regard to any metaphysical theoretica...We can have no theoretical knowledge of the ultimate constitution of reality as ...We cannot determine whether, independent of appearances, material objects consis...

    Similar

    The divine mind is immeasurably beyond human understanding.80%Stroud is pushed toward the immodest conclusion that it is not possibl...79%Talk about minds and external objects beyond perceptions is explicable...77%Given CT, we must also conceive of W as featuring mind-independent obj...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    Kant can thus be seen to have made two major points about transcendental idealism. (1) Although he never questions the existence of something independent of our representations of it, he can claim to have shown that when it comes to the ultimate constitution of this reality as it may be considered independently of the way it appears to beings endowed with reason and (human) sensibility we can know nothing on theoretical grounds; on practical grounds, as we have seen, he insisted that we can rati

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective