Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    We do not ordinarily think that day is the cause of night... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Hume's definition of causation as constant conjunction is too broad, because it entails that night is the cause of day and day is the cause of night.

    We do not ordinarily think that day is the cause of night, or that night is the cause of day.

    CausationMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityCausation

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Perception
    1 linked

    Related

    Hume defines a cause as something that is constantly conjoined with its effect.Hume's definition of causation as constant conjunction is too broad, because it ...Night and day have constantly followed each other since the beginning of the wor...

    Similar

    The relation between night and day is not one of causation.89%Hume's definition of causation as constant conjunction is too broad, b...81%Night and day are constantly conjoined.76%Night and day have constantly followed each other since the beginning ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reid
    View source passageHide passage
    The problem is made clearer by Reid's second objection to Hume's analysis of causation and constant conjunction. He writes, “It follows from [Hume's] definition of a cause, that night is the cause of day, and day the cause of night. For no two things have more constantly followed each other since the beginning of the world” (EAP 4.9, 249). Since we don't ordinarily think that day is the cause of night, or vice versa, Hume must deny that the two are actually constantly conjoined, or, rather, he m

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective