Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that We often form false judgements about the true nature of the movements experienced by the senses
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Sensory experience reliably tracks relational properties of movements (faster/slower, approach/recession) even if not their intrinsic nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Accurate relational perception of movement is sufficient for knowledge of physical causation, undermining the claim that senses systematically mislead about motion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Reid's direct realism holds that perceptual judgements about external qualities are constitutively tied to the movements that cause them, not merely correlated.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If perceptual content is partly constituted by its causal movement-basis, there is no epistemic gap in which systematic false judgement about that basis could arise.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The senses serve a life-preserving role rather than a truth-revealing role regarding the nature of movements
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The life-preserving function of the senses distorts or displaces their capacity to report the true nature of sensory movements
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.