Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Weak moralism is the view that harmless wrongdoing can be... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Weak moralism must be endorsed if there are cases of harmless wrongdoing where legal regulation is on-balance justified

    Weak moralism is the view that harmless wrongdoing can be pro tanto and on-balance legally justified in at least some cases

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Related

    If any such cases should be regulated, that regulation cannot be grounded in har...Unsuccessful criminal attempts, fraud and blackmail that cause no harm, desecrat...Weak moralism must be endorsed if there are cases of harmless wrongdoing where l...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Weak moralism only holds that some harmless wrongdoing may be legally ...91%Weak moralism must be endorsed if there are cases of harmless wrongdoi...86%Many forms of legal moralism are unjustifiable83%The legal moralist need not regulate all harmless wrongdoing82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    As we’ve just seen, liberal claims that harmless immorality should not be regulated are inconsistent with strong moralism, but not with weak moralism. It’s clear that Mill rejects strong moralism. What is less clear is whether he also rejects weak moralism. We must endorse weak moralism if we think that there are cases of harmless wrongdoing where legal regulation is not only pro tanto justified but also on-balance justified. Any list is potentially controversial, but many people would think tha

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective