Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Weak or uneducated people, children, and animals cannot be expected to mark their inner conditions
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Piaget and subsequent developmental psychologists demonstrate that children possess progressive metacognitive capacities from early childhood, not a binary absence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The supporting argument conflates the threshold for full self-control with the threshold for any inner perception, making it an invalid inference.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Aristotle's account of akrasia presupposes that weakness of will coexists with genuine awareness of one's own states, not blindness to them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If weak-willed agents can perceive their inner conditions while failing to resist them, then lack of self-control is not evidence of lacking inner perception.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Inner perception requires a capacity to notice and resist incipient impulses
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Weak or uneducated people, children, and animals lack the developed capacity for self-control that inner perception requires
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.