Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Weber held two distinct methodological commitments: (1) p... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Equating methodological individualism with rational choice theory fails to distinguish two distinct methodological issues that Weber recognized as separate.

    Weber held two distinct methodological commitments: (1) providing explanations at an action-theoretic level, and (2) choosing a specific model of rational action (ideal type) for use at that level.

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Action-theoretic level(as a method of explanation)
    An explanation that focuses on individual people and the choices they make, rather than looking at big group patterns or society as a whole. It's about understanding why a person does something specific.
    Methodological commitments(as methods both philosophers agreed to use)
    Shared promises or agreements between thinkers to use the same rules and approaches when studying a topic.
    Rational action

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as the type of human behavior Weber analyzed)
    Behavior where a person thinks through their options carefully and chooses the action that best helps them achieve their goal. It assumes people aren't making random or emotional decisions, but logical ones.
    Weber(as the main philosopher being discussed)
    Max Weber was a German sociologist (1864-1920) who developed methods for understanding why people act the way they do by looking at their inner motivations and beliefs.
    ideal type(Weber's terminology; rational choice theory and communicative action theory are examples of competing ideal types)
    The specific model of rational action that a methodological individualist proposes to employ at the action-theoretic level of explanation.

    Related

    Equating methodological individualism with rational choice theory fails to disti...Methodological individualism is a commitment to action-theoretic explanation, no...Rational choice theory is only one possible model of rational action that can be...

    Similar

    A methodological individualist can coherently employ Habermas's theory...78%Rational choice theory is only one possible model of rational action t...76%Social-scientific explanations must specify mechanisms at the action-t...76%Naturalist approaches treat rationality as an explanans that explains ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: methodological-individualism
    View source passageHide passage
    Nevertheless, as a result of Elster’s arguments, methodological individualism became synonymous in many quarters with the commitment to rational choice theory. Such an equation generally fails to distinguish what were for Weber two distinct methodological issues: the commitment to providing explanations at an action-theoretic level, and the specific model of rational action that one proposes to use at that level (i.e., the ideal type). There are multiple permutations. For instance, there is no r

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective