Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Were such a set to exist, paradoxical consequences would ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→In ZF and ZFC, the totality of transfinite cardinal numbers does not qualify as a set having a definite cardinal number of members.

    Were such a set to exist, paradoxical consequences would ensue akin to Russell's paradox.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    In ZF and ZFC, the totality of transfinite cardinal numbers does not qualify as ...

    Similar

    The First can produce a plurality of effects, more and less perfect ef...73%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    It would be natural to assume that the Supreme Being has the power to ...71%
    Scientific theories do not appear to require the existence of any set ...70%
    A chain of possible things cannot regress infinitely and must terminat...69%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: omnipotence
    View source passageHide passage
    The founder of transfinite arithmetic, Georg Cantor (1845–1918), is also a founding father of set theory. He famously proved that the set of real numbers has a larger cardinal number than the set of natural numbers; the set of reals has the same cardinality as the power set (the set of all subsets) of the set of naturals. Cantor further argued that \(\aleph_0\) is the first (and smallest) transfinite cardinal number in an infinite series of increasingly larger transfinite cardinals, \(\aleph_0,\) \(\aleph_1,\) \(\aleph_2\), and so on. But note that the numerical subscripts of these alephs do n...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective