Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Weyl rejects Principle C — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Without Principle C of physical causality conjoined with the kinematic principle of relative motion, it is not groundless or impossible that a stationary body of fluid at rest takes the form of a sphere while a rotating body takes the form of a flattened ellipsoid

    Weyl rejects Principle C

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Only by conjoining the kinematic principle of relative motion with Principle C d...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Without Principle C of physical causality conjoined with the kinematic principle...

    Similar

    The Logical Connection Argument fails66%Kepler explicitly rejects Aristotelian moving intelligences.65%The output is determined by whether the final configuration is accepti...59%Matter is entirely inert and passive.58%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: weyl
    View source passageHide passage
    The underlying motivation for assumption \(\mathbf{C}\) of physical causality is essentially Mach’s empiricist programme, namely, Mach’s insistence on the primacy of observable facts of experience. Addressing Einstein’s formulation of Mach’s paradox, Weyl (1924b) says: Only if we conjoin the kinematic principle of relative motion with the physical assumption \(\mathbf{C}\) does it appear groundless or impossible on the basis of the kinematic principle that in the absence of any external forces a

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective