Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    What appear to be conventions (e.g., kicking the ball out... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→An adequate account of sport must appeal to collectively agreed-upon norms called conventions.

    What appear to be conventions (e.g., kicking the ball out) are better explained as defeasible moral obligations arising from general ethics, not sport-specific norms.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Fair play and honesty are general ethical duties that apply universally, not invented by sports rulebooks.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Players who kick the ball out demonstrate they recognize moral obligations to opponents independent of formal rules.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Sport-specific norms vary widely across cultures; universal ethics provide better explanatory foundation for shared conduct.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Ball-out conventions exist in sports lacking general ethical guidance, suggesting norms are internally generated.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Players follow ball-out rules even when no ethical duty exists—e.g., kicking out when trailing suggests norm-following, not morality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.General ethics cannot explain sport-specific practices like deliberate fouls as strategic play, which violate but aren't immoral.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    An adequate account of sport must appeal to collectively agreed-upon norms calle...Ball-out conventions exist in sports lacking general ethical guidance, suggestin...Fair play and honesty are general ethical duties that apply universally, not inv...General ethics cannot explain sport-specific practices like deliberate fouls as ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Players follow ball-out rules even when no ethical duty exists—e.g., kicking out...Players who kick the ball out demonstrate they recognize moral obligations to op...Sport-specific norms vary widely across cultures; universal ethics provide bette...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit