Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that What can change is not a perfect case of being.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Heraclitean and process traditions hold that change is constitutive of being, not a privation of it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If all existing things in the natural order are changeable, then changeability is a mark of being, not its absence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Augustine's argument presupposes a Platonic hierarchy of being that is itself a contested metaphysical posit, not a neutral premise.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Being is not a univocal property admitting of degrees, but a categorical status that a thing either has or lacks.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If changeable things genuinely exist, they instantiate being fully, not deficiently, since partial being is incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
What can change does not have its being so securely that it cannot cease to be what it is.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.