Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    What is avoidable by permissible action is itself permiss... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Strategic action to avoid egalitarian duties to needy people seems permissible if those duties arise solely from cooperative participation.

    What is avoidable by permissible action is itself permissible to avoid.

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    2 linked

    Related

    Egalitarian duties to needy people arise only because the needy participate in a...If the basis of a duty is contingent participation in a cooperative scheme, then...Strategic action to avoid egalitarian duties to needy people seems permissible i...

    Similar

    It must be clear when the action is to be taken or avoided.77%Where avoidance is not possible, incidental civilian harm must at mini...76%Mill requires only that an action risks harm, not that harm is certain...75%Wagering for God is morally impermissible because it may require corru...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: egalitarianism
    View source passageHide passage
    This line of thought prompts several questions. If stringent egalitarian duties to needy people arise only because the needy participate in a scheme of cooperation with the non-needy, then strategic action to avoid the duties seems permissible. If the rich separate from the poor and form their own distinct political communities, the reciprocity argument will no longer support the claim that the rich have substantial obligations to the poor. One might question whether genuine justice obligations

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective