Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    What is meant by this right is not that failing to impose... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Wrongdoers have a right to be treated as responsible agents who can be held accountable and punished, rather than as sick or dangerous beasts.

    What is meant by this right is not that failing to impose punishment always wrongs them, but that they have the right to be treated as the kind of being who can be held responsible and punished.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Key Terms

    Held responsible(as used in ethics and legal philosophy)
    Being considered the proper target of judgment and consequences for your actions because you're capable of understanding right and wrong.
    Moral agency / moral agent(as used in ethics)
    A being who can understand the difference between right and wrong and make choices based on that understanding—treating someone as a 'kind of being' who can be morally responsible.
    Punishment(Locke 1689: sec 8)
    A response to rights violations administered with sufficient severity to deter the offender and others, and to give the offender cause to repent.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Right (in philosophy)(as used in ethics and political philosophy)
    A justified claim that others must respect or fulfill—like how you have the right to free speech means others shouldn't stop you from speaking your mind.

    Related

    Some retributivists hold that wrongdoers have a 'right to be punished' such that...Wrongdoers have a right to be treated as responsible agents who can be held acco...

    Similar

    Wrongdoers have a right to be treated as responsible agents who can be...82%Some retributivists hold that wrongdoers have a 'right to be punished'...81%A violation of a right involves both a hurt to some assignable person ...81%The thought that punishment treats wrongdoers as they deserve to be tr...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: justice-retributive
    View source passageHide passage
    One more matter should be mentioned under the heading of the desert object: namely the idea put forward by some retributivists, that wrongdoers have a “right to be punished” such that not punishing them wrongs them (Hegel 1821; H. Morris 1968). It is important to be clear about what this right is. It would be ludicrous to hold that an executive wrongs a wrongdoer by showing her mercy and pardoning her. What is meant is that wrongdoers have the right to be treated as the kind of being who can be held responsible and punished, rather than as sick or dangerous beasts.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective