Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    What one never experiences cannot constitute a reason to ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The metaphysical oneness of persons posited by Absolute Idealism gives no practical reason to consider another's interests when those interests conflict with one's own.

    What one never experiences cannot constitute a reason to act on another's behalf.

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Perception
    1 linked

    Related

    A reason to act requires that the relevant fact be accessible to the agent in so...The metaphysical oneness of persons posited by Absolute Idealism gives no practi...The oneness of persons in Absolute Idealism is a feature of Reality, not of Appe...

    Similar

    Absolute Idealism cannot supply a person with a reason to refrain from...75%Reasons cannot be causes of actions.75%One has no less a reason to act for the good of anyone and everyone el...75%The conduct of a Mafioso cannot be coherently justified.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: russell-moral
    View source passageHide passage
    Now this argument has an interesting corollary which Russell does not explicitly draw. It may be that in Reality the pains I inflict on you affect me—or at least a larger mind-like thing in which we both participate—but if I never experience those effects, how can this give me a motive to do or forbear if my interests conflict with yours? How can the fact that you and I are in Reality one (or at least part of one) give me a reason to look out for you, if this oneness is something I never experie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective