Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Whatever is divisible is not a true unity — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Materialism is false

    Whatever is divisible is not a true unity

    Perception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind7 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A perception is a state whereby a variety of content is represented in a true un...If matter cannot explain perception, then materialism is falseMaterialism holds that matter can explain (is identical with, can give rise to) ...Materialism is false
    +4 moreShow less
    Matter is infinitely divisibleTherefore, matter cannot explain, be identical with, or give rise to perceptionTherefore, matter cannot form a true unityWhatever is not a true unity cannot give rise to perception

    Similar

    Whatever is not a true unity cannot give rise to perception83%Matter is divisible because it is composed of separable bodies, not be...77%Matter is infinitely divisible75%The third principle of divisibility is introduced to present the non-I...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    Leibniz’s point is that whatever is the subject of perception and consciousness must be truly one, a single “I” properly regarded as one conscious being. An aggregate of matter is not truly one and so cannot be regarded as a single I capable of being the subject of a unified mental life. This interpretation fits nicely with Lebniz’s oft-repeated definition of perception as “the representation in the simple of the compound, or of that which is outside” (Principles of Nature and Grace, sec.2 (1714

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective