Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that When an individual labors on an unowned object, rights to control over that object are generated.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Labor mixing with an unowned object gives no principled reason to gain the object rather than lose the labor (Nozick's 'tomato juice' objection).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Ownership of labor does not entail ownership of every object with which labor is causally entangled, only the value added by that labor.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Pre-social property rights cannot be established by labor alone; property institutions require prior social recognition and enforcement to be legitimate (Hume, Rawls).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If property rights precede and are independent of social convention, they cannot ground the specific legal entitlements modern IP regimes actually confer.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Individuals own their own bodies and labor (self-ownership).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
When an individual labors on an unowned object, the labor becomes infused in the object.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
For the most part, the labor and the object cannot be separated once mixed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.