Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    When sensory integration processes can reassign bodily ow... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Bodily self-ascriptions grounded in body senses (proprioception, interoception) are immune to error through misidentification relative to the first-person.

    When sensory integration processes can reassign bodily ownership to non-self objects, proprioception fails the reliability condition IEM presupposes.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Rubber hand illusions demonstrably reassign bodily ownership to external objects through multisensory synchrony, not introspective authority.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If proprioception can be systematically deceived about ownership boundaries, it lacks the immunity to error through misidentification IEM requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.IEM's reliability condition assumes proprioceptive content is self-verifying; sensory reassignment shows content can be accurate yet ownership-false.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Rubber hand illusions affect judgment about ownership, not proprioceptive content itself—distinction IEM defenders can maintain consistently.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Temporary illusions don't undermine reliability conditions; proprioception remains statistically robust across normal embodied contexts overall.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.IEM applies to basic proprioceptive states, not high-level body schema; illusions target the latter, leaving immunity to error through misidentification intact.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Perception1 linkedPersonal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Bodily self-ascriptions grounded in body senses (proprioception, interoception) ...IEM applies to basic proprioceptive states, not high-level body schema; illusion...IEM's reliability condition assumes proprioceptive content is self-verifying; se...If proprioception can be systematically deceived about ownership boundaries, it ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Rubber hand illusions affect judgment about ownership, not proprioceptive conten...Rubber hand illusions demonstrably reassign bodily ownership to external objects...Temporary illusions don't undermine reliability conditions; proprioception remai...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit