Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that When the choice set itself is unjustly constrained, selecting the least-bad option within it does not render that option morally unproblematic.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If all options in a constrained set are genuinely available to the agent, the source of constraint is morally distinct from the choice itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Declaring the least-bad option 'morally problematic' offers agents no practical guidance and may paralyze action when some outcomes are preferable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral evaluation of choices should focus on what was reasonably within the agent's control, not on systemic injustices upstream of their decision.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral status depends partly on how options came to exist, not only on their intrinsic properties. Unjust constraints taint all downstream choices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Choosing the least-bad option under unjust constraints can reinforce or legitimize the system that created those constraints in the first place.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
An agent retains moral responsibility for participating in unjust systems, even when objectively choosing the best available path within them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.